BETTENSON DOCUMENTS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PDF

Deceptive quote : Trinitarian Gives false impression that the majority who opposed the Nicene creed believed Jesus is a creature. Bettenson, Henry: Documents of the Christian Church What Anti-Trinitarians quote: " The decisions of Nicea were really the work of a minority, and they were misunderstood and disliked by many" Documents of the Christian Church, Henry Bettenson What they left out to deliberately misrepresent the source and deceive you: Attempts to overthrow the Nicene Formulas: The decisions of Nicaea were really the work of a minority, and they were misunderstood and disliked by many who were not adherents of Arius. In particular the terms [Greek] aroused opposition, on the grounds that they were unscriptural, novel, tending to Sabellianism taking [Greek] in the sense of particular reality and erroneous metaphysically. Documents of the Christian Church, Henry Bettenson, 2nd Ed , p 41 Our comment Anti-Trinitarians leave off the important " who were not adherents of Arius" because they want you to think that the "majority who disliked" the Nicene creed, were aligned with the Arians who taught Jesus was a creature. The opposition was also from those who "misunderstood" what the creed was saying.

Author:Zulkizuru Miran
Country:Iran
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Medical
Published (Last):17 January 2011
Pages:134
PDF File Size:13.50 Mb
ePub File Size:4.25 Mb
ISBN:267-5-76832-117-3
Downloads:16490
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Faukinos



Deceptive quote : Trinitarian Gives false impression that the majority who opposed the Nicene creed believed Jesus is a creature. Bettenson, Henry: Documents of the Christian Church What Anti-Trinitarians quote: " The decisions of Nicea were really the work of a minority, and they were misunderstood and disliked by many" Documents of the Christian Church, Henry Bettenson What they left out to deliberately misrepresent the source and deceive you: Attempts to overthrow the Nicene Formulas: The decisions of Nicaea were really the work of a minority, and they were misunderstood and disliked by many who were not adherents of Arius.

In particular the terms [Greek] aroused opposition, on the grounds that they were unscriptural, novel, tending to Sabellianism taking [Greek] in the sense of particular reality and erroneous metaphysically. Documents of the Christian Church, Henry Bettenson, 2nd Ed , p 41 Our comment Anti-Trinitarians leave off the important " who were not adherents of Arius" because they want you to think that the "majority who disliked" the Nicene creed, were aligned with the Arians who taught Jesus was a creature.

The opposition was also from those who "misunderstood" what the creed was saying. In other words, they felt the creed could lend support to Sabellianism modalism, as taught today by the United Pentecostal church UPCI of which they were equally opposed, when in fact it did not! Equally damaging is the fact that Athanasius, who was in agreement with the creed, was banished as well as Arius!

These two represented the two main factions in the Nicene council! Deception Exposed: The deception is in projecting the false impression into the readers mind that the majority who opposed the Nicene council rejected the deity of Christ and the personality of the Holy Spirit. Such is a false dilemma, deceptively created in the mind of the reader, that any who opposed the Nicene council believe Jesus was a creature!

ACROCOMIA TOTAI PDF

Documents Of The Christian Church

.

HISTORICAL ILLUMINATUS CHRONICLES PDF

The Documents of the Christian Church

.

Related Articles